Sunday, November 12, 2017

Aston Martin DB4

Everybody knows the Aston Martin DB5. James Bond’s effortlessly cool grand tourer has come to represent the epitome of British car design—sleek, dignified, and confident. But fewer people know its predecessor, the DB4, on which the DB5 was heavily based. The DB4 race car seen here is a particularly fine example, and the subtle styling differences between it and the DB5 give the DB4 a more aggressive vibe than its legendary offspring.



The most noticeable difference between the DB4 and the DB5 is the headlights—the DB5’s units are enclosed in a glass dome whereas the DB4 features protruding circular headlamps. Because they lack the smooth, receding glass of the DB5’s units, the DB4’s headlights give the front fascia a more upright, stocky look. The race car version seen here is particularly muscular. Tape over the headlights—which is required at many vintage racing events to keep the glass from completely shattering in a crash and covering the track—lends the DB4 a purposeful, tactical appearance. 
Further adding to the Aston’s brawny demeanor are the two massive scoops, one sitting above and one lurking below the grille. The two intakes, combined with the wide frown of the classic Aston Martin grille, make the racing DB4 look like it wants to eat you. This is not a car you’d want to see looming in your rearview mirror around the track. 

Behind the bulging front fenders is an oval vent split by silver bar—an element that has become a staple of Aston’s design, appearing in a modernized form on the new DB11. The gleaming chrome side view mirrors act as a reminder of the race car’s noble Aston Martin origins. 
The DB4’s body panels feature no sharp creases, instead consisting of flowing, windswept curves that give the Aston Martin a floaty, elegant aura. This particular example’s simple lines are accentuated by the basic but classy livery—a green racing stripe runs the length of the car while yellow lipstick adorns the grille. 

While not as famous as its successor, the DB4—and especially this race car version—is just as beautiful, but with a hint of dynamic aggression that the more sophisticated DB5 lacks.







Grade
Front: A
Back: A-
Overall: A

Photos courtesy of James Harvey

Lamborghini Urraco

It’s pretty easy to identify a modern Lamborghini as a Lamborghini. Bonkers styling, full of razor-edged angles, gaping vents, and an aggressive stance, set them apart from the relative restraint of McLarens and effortless beauty of Ferraris. Furthermore, while Ferrari expanded its range to include the “downmarket” California and four-seater AWD FF, Lambo has stuck to a lineup of two high-intensity supercars and the occasional one-off for the past 15 years.

While Lamborghini has been focusing on blisteringly quick supercars of late, it hasn’t always been this way. Back in the 1970s, Lamborghini produced the car you see above, the (somewhat) practical and subtle Urraco. Built to battle other entry-level 2+2 sports cars like the Ferrari Dino 308 GT4 and Maserati Merak, the Urraco featured a more spacious interior, a 180-247 hp mid-mounted V8, and more subdued styling than the Countach it was sold alongside. However, the simpler design doesn’t make the Urraco any less stunning. 

Up front, the Urraco’s long, flat hood is duplicitous, suggesting a front-engine setup when in fact the V8 is housed behind the rear seats. Pop-up headlights hide above the thin chrome bumper, and the two deep, rectangular vents in the hood give the Urraco a more weighted, muscular look. 
The windshield protrudes upwards at relatively steep angle—especially compared to the one-box Countach—and the upright cabin hints at the more usable intentions of the Urraco. Slab-sided doors and light character lines give the Lambo a glassy, tranquil appearance.

The Urraco’s defining feature is the set of “wings” that cover the C-pillar. These black panels give the Urraco a unique look to distinguish it from its competitors, while also pairing with the rear window louvres to add a dash of athleticism. 

Lamborghini’s 2+2 would only stay in production for six years, before being replaced by the two-seat Silhouette and Jalpa. While not the most ambitious design, the Urraco’s crisp, smooth wedge and quirky C-pillar make is an elegant and interesting design, and a very lucky spot.


Grade
Front: A-
Back: A-
Overall: A

Photos courtesy of James Harvey

Tuesday, August 8, 2017

Reveal: Bollinger B1



The electric revolution is underway. Tesla's meteoric rise has sent established automakers scrambling to revamp their lineups and start-ups are materializing left and right. Most new EVs have fallen into two categories: sleek, luxurious spaceships like the Tesla Model X, or awkward but aerodynamic hatchbacks like the Nissan Leaf. The world's first electric sports utility truck, the Bollinger B1, bucks these trends. Unveiled July 27th at the Classic Car Club in Manhattan, the B1 is a work truck for the future and doesn't pretend to be anything else. With a simple but purposeful design and promising specifications, the B1 should be a hit if it manages to reach production.

The idea for an electric utility truck came to Robert Bollinger, a former advertising executive who had studied design at Carnegie Mellon, after he started a cattle farm in upstate New York. He decided he wanted a truck that could handle farming jobs and all-terrain trekking while also being able to comfortably drive around town and not burn any gas.

Bollinger designer Ross Compton stated that the B1's "ethos is simplicity," and this is immediately visible in the exterior design. The boxy, minimalist body reveals the B1's back-to-basics approach--as Compton affirmed, this is a work truck that "is meant to be used." The designer admitted to benchmarking competitors, and you can spot hints of other off-roaders: the front fascia features Land Rover Defender cues, while the stance is reminiscent of the 2004 Ford Bronco Concept. However, it doesn't feel like Bollinger is stealing these design elements, rather the design is paying homage and repurposing them for the EV era.

One of the most interesting pieces of the exterior design is the space where the grille normally resides; instead there is a metal door that folds down to open the frunk (front trunk). This is one of the few indicators of the B1's powertrain, but the grille-less front fascia doesn't look as odd as other EV's, since the hatch is flanked by two menacing cooling vents. Below sits a jet black bumper carrying tow hooks and a winch, announcing the trucks utilitarian intentions. As a fledgling company, the Bollinger team had many limitations to work around, and one was that the headlight shape had to be kept simple. According to Compton, there was debate over round versus square units, but eventually they landed on round LEDs, which lends the front end a classic mien.

Founder and CEO, Robert Bollinger, with the B1
This retro look is continued throughout the rest of the B1. Exposed rivets give off an industrial, handmade aura, while the relatively thin roof pillars harken back to the first generation Ford Bronco. Along the side, the visible door hinges, large rectangular vent, and knobby off-road tires look gritty and industrial. Out back, the minimalist design language is continued with understated round taillights and straight-edged proportions.

While the design is simple, the combination of tough and classic elements, along with the sinister matte grey and black paint job, creates a badass look: when the prototype emerged from a cloud of smoke at the reveal, it struck me as the perfect ride for a Bond movie villain.

The interior continues the design themes of the exterior: it is pared back but luxurious, similar to retro-modern feel of the Icon-modified Broncos. The dashboard is brushed metal, and unlike nearly every modern car, it is devoid of a touchscreen. Instead, four analog gauges sit behind the steering wheel (including one for the amount of electrical charge) and a round chrome radio sits alone in the center of the dash.
The pass-through tunnel runs the length of the car, and allows
long objects to be loaded easily.

The rear seats fold up to increase trunk space.
The seats are black leather and the inside of the door simply features a handle--opening the window is a manual operation. However, the best feature of the cabin is the full-length storage space. A small pass-through door from the frunk to the cockpit allows long objects that stretch the length of the car, like wood planks, to be easily loaded and transported. Furthermore, the rear seats easily fold up and to the side, increasing the already vast trunk space. Inside, the B1 sticks to its intent as a utility truck, with a minimal but upscale-feeling interior that maximizes usable space. Another helpful feature is the ability to transition the B1 into a two-seat pickup by removing the roof panels and side glass and sliding the C-pillar forward.

With a handsome, retro exterior and a clean, simple interior, the last piece of the puzzle is performance. The Bollinger B1, according to the company, is going to be more than capable enough for day-to-day farm or construction work and cruising around town. The electric powertrain combined with all wheel drive produces 360 hp and 472 lb-ft of torque, which will propel the B1 to 60 mph in 4.5 seconds and to a top speed of 127 mph. Two battery sizes are available, 60 or 100 kWh, which provide 120 and 200 miles of range respectively. The performance stats best those of other off-road SUVs and pickups, while the range is similar to other electric cars. The B1 also boasts 6100 lbs of towing capacity and 6100 lbs of payload capacity--more than the Jeep Wrangler and on par with midsize trucks like the Chevy Colorado. According to engineer Dan Aliberti, who owns a Wrangler as his daily driver, the B1 has a "relatively smooth ride because of the hydro-pneumatic suspension" while managing to be "more capable than a stock Wrangler."  Should these preliminary specifications translate to the final production version, the Bollinger B1 will prove to be an extremely competent workhorse.

Bollinger is currently working to secure a production partner and hope to have the B1 on sale in 2019. While cost is still unknown, the impressive numbers, simple construction, and attractive exterior should draw in customers looking for a work truck to putt around the construction site or farm in. Hopefully we will begin to see the B1 on roads in just a few years time.

Grades
Front: A
Back: A
Interior: A
Overall: A

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

5 Takeaways from the First-Ever Formula E NYC ePrix

1. The noise takes some getting used to...

...but is actually pretty cool. The whirr of electric motors can't hold a candle to the wail of an F1 car (even in the V6 hybrid era), but when the cars are driving at 140 mph, very little of the sound that you hear actually comes from the motors. Instead, the sound of wind sweeping over the aerodynamic bodywork and the squeal of tires dominate. Hearing the tires chirp as the cars sped around the circuit was informative, helping me pick out where the cars were struggling to find grip. Furthermore, the combination of noises creates a robotic and futuristic effect, making for a exhilarating experience.


2. The cars are much faster in person than on TV
Going into the race weekend, I was skeptical. Not only is the nuanced sound reduced in videos, but the race cars also look lethargic. But from the moment the five red lights went out, I knew that the videos had been deceptive. The instant maximum torque produced by electric motors means the cars jump off the line, and as 20 cars blasted past me on the opening straight, I was blown away. Speeds do decrease deeper into the race as drivers look to conserve energy, but the cars continued to move around the track at a blistering pace.

3. And the racing is pretty exciting

The Brooklyn circuit is quite narrow and features some pretty tight turns, but it doesn't turn into a Monaco-like parade. Passing was plentiful, and a battle for the lead on Sunday between Sam Bird, Felix Rosenqvist, and Nick Heidfeld produced some fierce moves. Unlike fragile Formula 1 cars, a small touch doesn't result in irreparable damage. Many of the most exciting incidents of the weekend were because of the cars durability under light contact, for example when a defending Antonio Felix da Costa pushed into the side of Loic Duval as Duval attempted a pass around the outside, resulting in da Costa braking too late and spinning. 

4. The track could use more vantage points and more TV screens
While watching from the grandstand allowed a better overall view of parts of the track, it was far more electrifying to experience the race from down below, just 15 feet from the action. However, the TV screens were positioned only for those sitting in the two grandstands, making it impossible to follow the rest of the race while viewing from the ground. Furthermore, some of the best spots on the track for passing were inaccessible, such as the first hairpin after the starting line. And only about half of the circuit was open to the general public--the pit entry and exit, finish line, and several turns were all off limits to those without a VIP pass. Formula E should not only provide more screens so that spectators can follow the race from the ground, but the entire circuit should be accessible as well to create a less isolating experience.

5. And the fan experience still has logistical issues
The eVillage "fan zone," was advertised as being full of entertainment but resulted in a brief visit. The BMW and Jaguar stands were the most interesting--Jaguar brought its I-Pace Concept while BMW showed off the i8, i3, and 530e-- and the Roborace concept also made an appearance. There were only a few other stands, which featured some uninteresting marketing material and the racing simulators, which were overcrowded throughout the weekend. However, the most disappointing part of the eVillage was the autograph session. The line was completely unsupervised by staff, resulting in many people jumping in at the front, and in the 30 allotted minutes the entire line moved about 20 feet. Hundreds of fans waited on the line for all 30 minutes only to be turned away, and with no explanation of why the line had barely moved. I managed to catch up with Alex Lynn on his walk back to the paddock for an autograph and selfie, but other people continued waiting even after the 30 minutes, since the staff didn't bother telling those at the back of the line that the session was done.

Despite the issues with the eVillage and viewing the race from the sidelines, the ePrix itself was an thrilling experience and I look forward to Formula E returning to Brooklyn in the future.





   

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

Kia Stinger

The midsize luxury sport sedan segment has grown increasingly crowded. The long-time class leader is the BMW 3 Series. Mercedes has it's elegant C Class cruiser; there's also Audi's conservative A4, and Alfa Romeo's flashy new Giulia. Jaguar just rejoined after a long hiatus with the XE, Cadillac sells the ATS, Volvo still makes the aging S60, and there's also the Japanese brands: the Lexus IS, Infiniti Q50, and Acura TLX.

And now, there's the brand new Kia Stinger.

Wait, what? Kia and luxury, that seems like an oxymoron, but it is real. Kia, and sister brand Hyundai, have been expanding upwards into the luxury market over the past several years, having started with the Hyundai Genesis and Equus in the early 2010s. The full-size luxury Kia K900 was launched in 2013. Despite sluggish sales of the K900, Kia has pushed forward with the new mid-sized Stinger.

The sharp-looking Stinger shows the Korean brand can hold its own among the European heavyweights. The Stinger was a long time coming. It was previewed in 2011 by the GT Concept, a rear-wheel-drive, turbocharged V6-powered sedan, and the 2014 Kia GT4 Stinger Concept, a rear-drive turbocharged I4-powered coupe. Both concepts were dynamic and redefined what a Kia could be. But they were just concepts, unrestricted by budgets and safety regulations. No one was sure how a production version would come out.

Piercing headlights begin the aggressively elegant styling on the Stinger. The headlamps are comprised of two HID bulbs and a series of LED lights, creating a detailed, sleek appearance.  Kia's corporate grille, the Tiger Nose, sits between the sharp lights, thin and wide, looking like a menacing smile. While that may be a negative comment on a lot of cars, it works here. This is mirrored by a gaping vent below, which features two fierce chrome teeth sticking up at the edges. Both grilles feature a visually arresting dotted pattern. Flanking these grilles and slotted beneath the headlights are functional, cavernous air ducts, which feature a bold character line that extends out of the front splitter. Overall, the Kia Stinger's front fascia has an assertive mien.

The Stinger is most beautiful in profile, mainly due to the fastback body style. This swooping roofline is accentuated by the top window trim piece, which extends beyond the daylight opening, alongside the rear window, and into the trunk lid. Furthermore, a soft character line runs back from the headlights, creating a graceful belt line. The side view doesn't lose touch with the Stinger's performance intentions, however: polished grey window trim, blacked-out mirrors, and striking five-spoke wheels remind you of the Kia's athleticism. This image is bolstered by a large side vent, with sharp creases cutting through the doors behind it.

The tasteful mix of elegant and powerful design continues on the rear of the car. The full-width taillights, like the grille, employ the thin-and-wide look to make the car appear lower to the ground and more muscular. The taillights also sport a unique design element originally found on the GT Concept: the narrow strip that wraps around onto the rear fender. While the Stinger would have looked just fine without it, the extra-long taillights help distinguish it in a packed market. The lower rear fascia is full of character, with small faux vents sandwiching a piano black diffuser and quad exhaust pipes.

The Kia Stinger GT is a pretty direct interpretation of the GT Concept for the road. While some of the concept's looks were toned down, the Stinger's exterior still exudes performance, but doesn't overdo it. Instead, the fastback roof and ornate headlights and grille help the Kia stay classy. Let's just hope that the Stinger, which is set to be powered by a 360 hp twin-turbo V6, is as fast and fun to drive as it looks.

Grade
Front: A
Back: A
Overall: A















Monday, March 6, 2017

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

Car Lyric of the Week: Kanye West on "See Me Now" and "Run This Town"

"See Me Now":

"'Tention to detail is so uncanny
And the whip's on the Sprewells, it's so un-Camry"

"Run This Town":

"I bought my whole family whips; no Volvos"
"What you think I rap for, to push a f****n' RAV4?"

When rappers boast about their expensive cars, they tend name-drop famous supercars and luxo-barges: Ferraris, Rolls-Royces, and Maybachs to name a few. But in his verses on "See Me Now" and Jay Z's "Run This Town," Kanye West uses a different approach: explaining what he's not driving by insulting more ordinary cars. West takes shots at Toyota in both tracks, pointing out that he wouldn't still be rapping if all he could afford was a measly Toyota RAV4. He also drops hints about his immense net worth, claiming that he bought his relatives something more luxurious than a Volvo. West may have a point about the Toyotas, which are reliable but quite bland, but when it comes to the Volvos, he might want to reconsider. During the 1970s, Volvo earned a reputation as the perfect family car with its 200 Series. These boxy sedans and wagons were spacious and more importantly safe--and ever since Volvo has been a pioneer when it comes to safety. While a a Bentley may look more elegant, West might want to look at new Volvo, especially now that he is a father of two.



2015 Toyota Camry at NYIAS

Volvo 200 Series in Alaska
2016 Toyota RAV4 at NYIAS



Wednesday, February 8, 2017

DRIVEN: 2016 Hyundai Sonata

For the first 20 years of Hyundai's existence, their slogan could have easily been "Dull but sensible." From the late 1980s, when Hyundai entered the U.S. market, until the late 2000s their products were practical and functional, but certainly not desirable. But in 2010, Hyundai unveiled a radical look with a new Sonata midsize sedan and Tucson compact crossover. These two vehicles ushered in the "Fluidic Sculpture" design language, signaling a major shift as Hyundai began to shed its bland image over the next few years.

Now, in 2017, Hyundai has solidified itself as a main player in the affordable family car segment as it has continued to roll out more capable and attractive vehicles. "Fluidic Sculpture" has given way to a more sophisticated and straight-edged look, but the newest Sonata appears to be relying on these good looks to cover up some deeper flaws. Over the summer, I spent a week with a 2016 Hyundai Sonata SE, and while not as radical as its predecessor, the 2016 model is quite handsome. However, a few minor issues hurt the cabin and loose steering and unresponsive brakes let it down on the road.


Up front, the trapezoidal grille with thin horizontal chrome bars lends the Sonata a stately appearance and the shiny coating adds a dash of luxury. Chrome also graces the lower fascia, where a thin bar creates a sort of "eyebrow" for the fog light housing. While this "eyebrow" looks sharp, the base model doesn't actually feature fog lights in the housings, resulting in lots of empty, cheap-looking space. Above this design flourish sit the attractive headlights, the orientation of which echoes that of the previous generation: extending backwards and slightly widening when bending around onto the front fender. However, the 2016 Sonata does away with its predecessor's swooping design language, instead featuring a more squared-off outline. While conservative, the heavy use of straight lines creates a dignified, mature front fascia.

The attractive but safe styling continues on the sides of the Sonata, with a sharp character line traveling from the front wheel arch to the gas cap and another straight crease running parallel along the bottom of the doors. The five-spoke hubcaps are a pretty standard affair, as is the daylight opening, which simply follows the outline of the roof. One of the most unique elements of the previous generation returns: the chrome window trim starts at the headlight, instead of the base of the A-pillar, before wrapping its way around the side windows. By connecting the headlights to the daylight opening and extending the line created by the flowing LED strip in the headlight, this element subtly creates a cohesive profile design.

The Sonata features a short rear deck, making this midsize sedan seem more like a fastback. While a fastback design makes some cars, like the Audi A7, sleeker others end up looking stunted, like the BMW 5 Series GT. The Hyundai is somewhere in between--when viewed from the side, the roofline smoothly flows into the taillights, but when viewed from a rear three-quarters view it appears stubby. The rear deck also featured a small lip spoiler, which, along with the chrome-tipped trapezoidal exhaust pipes, adds a sporty flavor to the rear design. The taillights continue the trend from the front end of expressive, sharp, and straight lines. Overall, the rear end is attractive, although it would have been nice to see more chrome, to match the more luxurious and stately front end.

If all you did inside the Sonata was sit and look around, you would be quite happy. The seats, both front and back, are comfortable, although the off-white color makes dirt and stains easily visible. Legroom is plentiful for the front and rear seats, while headroom is spacious up front and slightly constricting for taller occupants in the back. The front dashboard design, while not particularly exciting, is still pleasant to look at--the combination of black, silver, and light tan works together well. The center console is well-organized and features a 7-inch infotainment screen--adequate for the segment. The piano black trim looks luxurious and isn't overused, which means fewer smudges. The gauge cluster behind the simple steering wheel also features a clean, ordered layout. The small screen in between the two gauges displays a useful graphic showing which doors are open.


However, once you begin to play with the knobs and interact with touch points, the Sonata begins to falter. The silver woven trim doesn't stand out when viewed from afar, but up close the bumpy texture looks and feels cheap. The dashboard would have fared better had it featured the smooth silver trim from the center console. The central control center is also flawed. The hazard button doesn't light up when the hazards are turned on, making it harder to know if you have accidentally left them flashing. The tuning and volume knobs for the radio were a bit finicky, making it easy to accidentally flip past the radio station you wanted or have trouble adjusting to the right volume. Finding the right station might not be a huge issue when cruising around your hometown, since you could preset your favorite stations, but when traveling somewhere new, as I was, it can get quite frustrating--particularly when searching through the myriad of channels offered by Sirius XM satellite radio. The ceiling of the cabin was covered in inexpensive fabric, which created an unattractive bump around the main cabin light.

Another annoying feature is the air conditioning vents, as the tabs used to adjust the direction of airflow prevent the vents from being fully closed causing conflict when one person gets cold but the others still want the AC. While they could simply try pointing the vent as far away from themselves, even this measure is futile, as the bulkiness of the tabs limits the angle at which the vents can be adjusted. My final quibble with the interior is one of personal preference, as I find the leather gear shift covers lumpy and unattractive.


Despite its distinguished looks, the Sonata does not drive like a luxury cruiser. The steering wheel feels very light, with a small adjustment by my hand causing the steering wheel to turn far more than was intended. This loose steering is uncommunicative, and definitely does not instill confidence in the driver. Neither do the unresponsive brakes. When I would push down on the brake pedal, there was absolutely no feedback, meaning I couldn't feel how much I was actually slowing down. While a quick check of the speedometer and my seat belt holding me in place through Newton's Third Law confirms that I am actually slowing down, it can still be disconcerting.

I also found issues with the gas pedal. Acceleration at city speeds was adequate, but pushing just a bit too hard on the throttle when at a standstill causes the Sonata to stumble slowly and then suddenly lurch forward. Furthermore, between 45 and 65 mph, the Sonata felt impossibly slow. When I would press down the throttle, the car would continue at that speed for what seemed like an eternity (probably more like 3 seconds) before finally kicking in and speeding up. This delayed acceleration was frustrating, and could prove stressful when passing on a two-way country road. Finally, the automatic gear shifter felt clunky when changing from "park" to "drive." Overall, from the driver's seat, the Sonata was a disappointment to drive.

The Sonata's handsome exterior design and pleasant interior are overshadowed by functionality issues in the cabin as well as unresponsive brakes, steering, and acceleration. Hyundai has certainly come a long way in the design department, but their midsize entry fails to provide a really gratifying driving experience.

Grade
Front: B+
Back: B+
Overall Exterior: B+

Front Seats: B-
Rear Seats: B
Overall Interior: B- 

Driving: C-